[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1392360843-22261-4-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:54:01 +0900
From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/5] mm/compaction: change the timing to check to drop the spinlock
It is odd to drop the spinlock when we scan (SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX - 1) th pfn
page. This may results in below situation while isolating migratepage.
1. try isolate 0x0 ~ 0x200 pfn pages.
2. When low_pfn is 0x1ff, ((low_pfn+1) % SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX) == 0, so drop
the spinlock.
3. Then, to complete isolating, retry to aquire the lock.
I think that it is better to use SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX th pfn for checking
the criteria about dropping the lock. This has no harm 0x0 pfn, because,
at this time, locked variable would be false.
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
index 0d821a2..b1ba297 100644
--- a/mm/compaction.c
+++ b/mm/compaction.c
@@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ isolate_migratepages_range(struct zone *zone, struct compact_control *cc,
cond_resched();
for (; low_pfn < end_pfn; low_pfn++) {
/* give a chance to irqs before checking need_resched() */
- if (locked && !((low_pfn+1) % SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX)) {
+ if (locked && !(low_pfn % SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX)) {
if (should_release_lock(&zone->lru_lock)) {
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lru_lock, flags);
locked = false;
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists