[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52FDC8F3.50100@marvell.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:42:43 +0800
From: Jane Li <jiel@...vell.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: "joe@...ches.com" <joe@...ches.com>,
"tj@...nel.org" <tj@...nel.org>,
"fweisbec@...il.com" <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: fix one circular lockdep warning about console_lock
On 02/12/2014 05:19 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> There are three locks involved in two sequence:
>> a) pm suspend:
>> console_lock (@suspend_console())
>> cpu_add_remove_lock (@disable_nonboot_cpus())
>> cpu_hotplug.lock (@_cpu_down())
> But but but. suspend_console() releases console_sem again.
Console_lock does not refer to console_sem but console_lock_dep_map. Its name is console_lock. Suspend_console() does not release console_lock_dep_map.
> So the
> sequence is actually
>
> down(&console_sem) (@suspend_console())
acquire(&console_lock_dep_map) (&suspend_console())
> up(&console_sem) (@suspend_console())
> cpu_add_remove_lock (@disable_nonboot_cpus())
> cpu_hotplug.lock (@_cpu_down())
>
> So console_sem *doesn't* nest outside cpu_add_remove_lock and
> cpu_hotplug.lock.
Add console_lock in the sequence.
>
>> b) Plug-out CPUx:
>> cpu_add_remove_lock (@(cpu_down())
>> cpu_hotplug.lock (@_cpu_down())
>> console_lock (@console_cpu_notify()) => Lockdeps prints warning log.
>>
>> There should be not real deadlock, as flag of console_suspended can
>> protect this.
> console_lock() does down(&console_sem) *before* testing
> console_suspended, so I don't understand this sentence - a more
> detailed description would help.
After suspend_console(), console_sem is unlocked, but console_lock_dep_map has been acquired.
Best Regards,
Jane
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists