[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140214090601.GA3906@netboy>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 10:06:01 +0100
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: stefan.sorensen@...ctralink.com, grant.likely@...aro.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] dp83640: Get pin and master/slave configuration
from DT
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 05:39:57PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> You'll have to code this in a way such that people who currently specify
> this parameter keep working.
So, do module parameters count as user land ABI?
[ In any case, for this module, there must be a way to retain the
parameters and still offer DT, and letting DT have precedence. ]
People want to be able to configure the auxiliary functions on the
pins of their PTP devices. My preference for supporting this is:
1. additional ioctl on the PTP character device
2. ethtool ioctl
3. DT and/or ACPI
The first option seems best because that is how you activate the
auxiliary functions. I am working on something in this direction.
Can't we just drop the DT idea altogther?
> If you don't like it, be angry at whoever added this module parameter
> in the first place, not me. Module parameters are 99 times out of 100
> not the right way to configure something, really.
Yeah, I am the one, be angry with me.
Sorry,
Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists