[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdaoqwiy0n-oN0gKqgX_enGXw+BggRQy9yz8eQNyJ3MvsA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 11:46:41 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, "arm@...nel.org" <arm@...nel.org>
Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: dbx500/abx500: root out hardcoded IRQ assignments
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
>> <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> > The DBx500 and ABx500 should be getting their IRQs from the
>> > device tree and nowhere else. Get rid of all the static assignments
>> > everywhere, delete it from the driver, platform data and the
>> > board files in one swift strike.
>> >
>> > Lots of cross-dependencies in the MFD drivers for PRCMU and
>> > AB8500 makes it necessary to strike everywhere at once to
>> > eradicate IRQs passed as resources and platform data to the left
>> > and right around the platform.
>> >
>> > Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
>> > Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
>> > Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
>> > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
>>
>> OK no major complaints, Lee can you queue this in the MFD tree
>> so we get some Linux-next rotation? If we need an immutable
>> branch remains to be seen, maybe we can merge this throug MFD
>> exclusively.
>
> I'm happy to do either, but the latter will require an ARM-SoC Ack.
OK Olof/Arnd/Kevin: can you ACK this patch for queueing
through MFD? It only hits arch/arm/mach-ux500/*
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists