[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140214153034.GA4015@opentech.at>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:30:34 +0100
From: Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@...r.at>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andreas Platschek <platschek@....tuwien.ac.at>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 4/5] allow preemption in
mem_cgroup_move_account_page_stat
On Fri, 14 Feb 2014, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> * Sebastian Andrzej Siewior | 2014-02-14 14:17:05 [+0100]:
>
> >Now, that I look at it again. Isn't it more efficient to keep preemption
> >disabled for this very short time instead instead of invoking
> >migrate_disable() which includes preempt_disable()/enable() and a few
> >more opcodes???
> >Therefore, I drop it again.
>
> I think doing the same for the 1/5 of this series since it also disables
> migration for a handfull of asm opcodes.
>
yup - nice run in the wrong direction :)
those short pushdowns make no sense - should have looked at that first...
the execution length/complexity (notably worst case on migrate_enable()) is
actually very high compared to a preempt_enable.
thx!
hofrat
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists