[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140214161801.GV18016@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:18:01 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, xfs@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: 3.14-rc2 XFS backtrace because irqs_disabled.
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 04:16:24PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> FWIW, there's a funny situation - all users of dequeue_signal_lock()
> actually ignore info completely. I'm not saying that we ought to
> stop returning it, but e.g. jbd part of that patch is simply
s/jbd/jffs2/, obviously. Sorry... And yes, nbd and usb_storage are the
same story.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists