linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 26/27] ARM: shmobile: lager-reference: Enable CMT0 in device tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1395114.O6aqLXJV0J@avalon>
Date:	Fri, 14 Feb 2014 17:26:44 +0100
From:	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To:	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
Cc:	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
	linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 26/27] ARM: shmobile: lager-reference: Enable CMT0 in device tree

Hi Sergei,

On Friday 14 February 2014 18:36:11 Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> On 14-02-2014 18:22, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >>>>> Enable the CMT0 device and configure channel 0 as a clock event
> >>>>> provider.
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart
> >>>>> <laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com>
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/include/mach/r8a7790.h
> >>>>> b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/include/mach/r8a7790.h index 0b95bab..62b31f3
> >>>>> 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/include/mach/r8a7790.h
> >>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/include/mach/r8a7790.h
> >>>>> @@ -29,7 +29,6 @@ enum {
> >>>>> 
> >>>>>   };
> >>>>>   
> >>>>>   void r8a7790_add_standard_devices(void);
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> -void r8a7790_add_dt_devices(void);
> >>>>> 
> >>>>>   void r8a7790_clock_init(void);
> >>>>>   void r8a7790_pinmux_init(void);
> >>>>>   void r8a7790_pm_init(void);
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a7790.c
> >>>>> b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a7790.c index 3e5813f..462c81f 100644
> >>>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a7790.c
> >>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a7790.c
> >>>>> @@ -294,11 +294,6 @@ static struct resource cmt0_resources[] = {
> >>>>>     					  &cmt##idx##_platform_data,	\
> >>>>>     					  sizeof(struct sh_timer_config))
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> -void __init r8a7790_add_dt_devices(void)
> >>>>> -{
> >>>>> -	r8a7790_register_cmt(0);
> >>>>> -}
> >>>>> -
> >>>>>  void __init r8a7790_add_standard_devices(void)
> >>>>>  {
> >>>>>     	r8a7790_register_scif(0);
> >>>>> @@ -311,7 +306,7 @@ void __init r8a7790_add_standard_devices(void)
> >>>>> 	r8a7790_register_scif(7);
> >>>>>  	r8a7790_register_scif(8);
> >>>>>  	r8a7790_register_scif(9);
> >>>>> -	r8a7790_add_dt_devices();
> >>>>> +	r8a7790_register_cmt(0);
> >>>>> 	r8a7790_register_irqc(0);
> >>>>> 	r8a7790_register_thermal();
> >>>>> }
> >>>> 
> >>>> IMHO, these 2 files should be split into a separate patch.
> >>> 
> >>> That could easily be done, but why ?
> >> 
> >> It does not seem necessary to combine these changes in one patch.
> >> Remember, Simon has separate branches for boards and SoCs. So finally
> >> it's up to him to decide on this...
> > 
> > Right, but in this case I need to remove the CMT platform device
> > registration from r8a7790_add_dt_devices()
> 
> You're not removing anything in these 2 files, you're just replacing
> "indirect" call to r8a7790_register_cmt(0) with direct.

OK, I see what you mean now. Given that the patch removes the 
r8a7790_add_dt_devices() call from arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-lager-
reference.c, I could indeed split those two changes into a separate patch as 
there's no-one calling the function anymore. That would introduce a dependency 
between the branches, which might not be better. I'll let Simon comment on 
what he would prefer and will act accordingly.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/