lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140214111939.58ecc154f74a9ea273df795a@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Fri, 14 Feb 2014 11:19:39 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@...il.com>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
	John Crispin <blogic@...nwrt.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless tree with Linus' tree

Hi John,

Today's linux-next merge of the wireless tree got a conflict in
drivers/bcma/driver_gpio.c between commit 2997609eb4c9 ("bcma: gpio: add
own IRQ domain") from Linus' tree and commit 6b6ee88774ae ("bcma: gpio:
register all 32 GPIOs") from the wireless tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).

[Aside, Ralf: that commit in Linus' tree is committed by you but has no
Signed-off-by from you.  There were a couple of others there as well.]
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

diff --cc drivers/bcma/driver_gpio.c
index 25f9887a35d0,39dadf5342c6..000000000000
--- a/drivers/bcma/driver_gpio.c
+++ b/drivers/bcma/driver_gpio.c
@@@ -215,10 -95,8 +215,10 @@@ int bcma_gpio_init(struct bcma_drv_cc *
  	chip->set		= bcma_gpio_set_value;
  	chip->direction_input	= bcma_gpio_direction_input;
  	chip->direction_output	= bcma_gpio_direction_output;
 +#if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_BCMA_HOST_SOC)
  	chip->to_irq		= bcma_gpio_to_irq;
 +#endif
- 	chip->ngpio		= 16;
+ 	chip->ngpio		= 32;
  	/* There is just one SoC in one device and its GPIO addresses should be
  	 * deterministic to address them more easily. The other buses could get
  	 * a random base number. */

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ