linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: mm: report both sections from PMD

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGXu5jK6Ro+u1VBsnQvNMZz4+iUZPLSRsd98oBgXCQAx=vW2YA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 14 Feb 2014 11:31:21 -0800
From:	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Steve Capper <steve.capper@...aro.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: mm: report both sections from PMD

On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/2/12/662
>
> It's not that simple, because APX in section descriptors doesn't exist
> on pre-v6 ARMs.  This needs to be conditional upon the CPU arch.

Ah! Okay, do we need a single #define to describe the expected masks
and values? What should it look like for pre-v6 ARMs?

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/