[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1402142140430.21991@ionos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 22:16:41 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
cc: Conrad Kostecki <ck@...rad-kostecki.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
Subject: Re: AW: AW: [PATCH] x86: HPET force enable for Soekris net6501
On Fri, 14 Feb 2014, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 02/14/2014 11:59 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Fri, 14 Feb 2014, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >> On 02/14/2014 11:15 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >>> I'm fine with ACPI tables if we can provide simple means for embedded
> >>> users to load one via grub or just attach it to the kernel image.
> >>
> >> That already exists, see Documentation/acpi/initrd_table_override.txt.
> >
> > That requires, that you have already ACPI tables.
> >
> > ACPI_SIG_RSDP cannot be overridden and that's the base table you need
> > to get ACPI going in the first place. So we need support for that and
> > probably for storing the tables at some non canonical place.
> >
>
> Well, the RSDP and RSDT/XSDT are nothing but pointers to other tables,
> so if explicitly overridden I'm not sure if one actually would need
> them. That doesn't mean our current code will work without them, though.
I tried once to overload all of the tables, but failed miserably in
the ACPI dungeon. RSDP was the major pain point IIRC.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists