lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL1ERfPhWbKRGr50Jq61gJ90zYhpMFN+T1tPNxJm0e1n31mcag@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 14 Feb 2014 11:39:45 +0800
From:	Weijie Yang <weijie.yang.kh@...il.com>
To:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc:	Weijie Yang <weijie.yang@...sung.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm/vmscan: restore sc->gfp_mask after promoting it to __GFP_HIGHMEM

On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 12:10 AM, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com> wrote:
> On 02/12/2014 09:39 PM, Weijie Yang wrote:
>
>> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
>> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
>> @@ -2298,14 +2298,17 @@ static bool shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
>>       unsigned long nr_soft_reclaimed;
>>       unsigned long nr_soft_scanned;
>>       bool aborted_reclaim = false;
>> +     bool promoted_mask = false;
>>
>>       /*
>>        * If the number of buffer_heads in the machine exceeds the maximum
>>        * allowed level, force direct reclaim to scan the highmem zone as
>>        * highmem pages could be pinning lowmem pages storing buffer_heads
>>        */
>> -     if (buffer_heads_over_limit)
>> +     if (buffer_heads_over_limit) {
>
> It took me a minute to figure out why you are doing things this way,
> so maybe this could use a comment, or maybe it could be done in a
> simpler way, by simply saving and restoring the original mask?
>                 orig_mask = sc->gfp_mask;

Yes, you are right. This simpler way is better. I will turn to it in
V2 resend patch.

Thanks!

>> +             promoted_mask = !(sc->gfp_mask & __GFP_HIGHMEM);
>>               sc->gfp_mask |= __GFP_HIGHMEM;
>> +     }
>>
>>       for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, zonelist,
>>                                       gfp_zone(sc->gfp_mask), sc->nodemask) {
>> @@ -2354,6 +2357,9 @@ static bool shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
>>               shrink_zone(zone, sc);
>>       }
>>
>> +     if (promoted_mask)
>                 sc->gfp_mask = orig_mask;
>
>> +             sc->gfp_mask &= ~__GFP_HIGHMEM;
>> +
>>       return aborted_reclaim;
>>  }
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ