[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52FEC818.7030604@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 09:51:20 +0800
From: Weng Meiling <wengmeiling.weng@...wei.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
CC: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@...allels.com>, <greg@...ah.com>,
<linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<devel@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfsd: check passed socket's net matches NFSd superblock's
one
Hi Bruce,
The upstream has merged your git tree for-3.14, but there is no this patch?
Do you forget this patch?
Thanks!
Weng Meiling
On 2014/1/4 6:22, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 05:23:59PM +0300, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
>> There could be a case, when NFSd file system is mounted in network, different
>> to socket's one, like below:
>>
>> "ip netns exec" creates new network and mount namespace, which duplicates NFSd
>> mount point, created in init_net context. And thus NFS server stop in nested
>> network context leads to RPCBIND client destruction in init_net.
>> Then, on NFSd start in nested network context, rpc.nfsd process creates socket
>> in nested net and passes it into "write_ports", which leads to RPCBIND sockets
>> creation in init_net context because of the same reason (NFSd monut point was
>> created in init_net context). An attempt to register passed socket in nested
>> net leads to panic, because no RPCBIND client present in nexted network
>> namespace.
>
> So it's the attempt to use a NULL ->rpcb_local_clnt4?
>
> Interesting, thanks--applying with a minor fix to logged message.
>
> --b.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists