lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140215232508.GB4508@pd.tnic>
Date:	Sun, 16 Feb 2014 00:25:08 +0100
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	John <da_audiophile@...oo.com>
Cc:	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"stephen@...workplumber.org" <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
	"mlindner@...vell.com" <mlindner@...vell.com>,
	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>,
	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference

On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 01:04:22PM -0800, John wrote:
> Thanks for the reply, Boris.  The .config is unmodified
> from the Arch Distro default for 3.13.3-1 which can be found
> here: http://pastebin.com/LPGZ8ZqA

Yep, it is that struct net *net argument to put_pipe_version() which is NULL:

  12:   55                      push   %ebp
  13:   89 e5                   mov    %esp,%ebp
  15:   56                      push   %esi
  16:   53                      push   %ebx
  17:   3e 8d 74 26 00          lea    %ds:0x0(%esi,%eiz,1),%esi
  1c:   8b 1d 28 e9 a3 f8       mov    0xf8a3e928,%ebx
  22:   89 c6                   mov    %eax,%esi
  24:   e8 59 64 5f c8          call   0xc85f6482
  29:   85 db                   test   %ebx,%ebx
  2b:*  8b 86 58 08 00 00       mov    0x858(%esi),%eax         <-- trapping instruction

put_pipe_version:
	pushl	%ebp	#
	movl	%esp, %ebp	#,
	pushl	%esi	#
	pushl	%ebx	#
	call	mcount
	movl	sunrpc_net_id, %ebx	# sunrpc_net_id, sunrpc_net_id.130
	movl	%eax, %esi	# net, net
	call	__rcu_read_lock	#
	testl	%ebx, %ebx	# sunrpc_net_id.130
	movl	2136(%esi), %eax	# MEM[(struct net_generic * const *)net_4(D) + 2136B], ng <-- trapping insn


	[ 137.689996] ESI: 00000000 EDI: f56efc00 EBP: f568fee8 ESP: f568fee0
			   ^^^^^^^^

Here's the c/asm interleaved version:

static void put_pipe_version(struct net *net)
{
     d80:       55                      push   %ebp
     d81:       89 e5                   mov    %esp,%ebp
     d83:       56                      push   %esi
     d84:       53                      push   %ebx
     d85:       e8 fc ff ff ff          call   d86 <put_pipe_version+0x6>
                        d86: R_386_PC32 mcount
        struct sunrpc_net *sn = net_generic(net, sunrpc_net_id);
     d8a:       8b 1d 00 00 00 00       mov    0x0,%ebx
                        d8c: R_386_32   sunrpc_net_id
        spin_unlock(&pipe_version_lock);
        return ret;
}

static void put_pipe_version(struct net *net)
{
     d90:       89 c6                   mov    %eax,%esi
 * block, but only when acquiring spinlocks that are subject to priority
 * inheritance.
 */
static inline void rcu_read_lock(void)
{
        __rcu_read_lock();
     d92:       e8 fc ff ff ff          call   d93 <put_pipe_version+0x13>
                        d93: R_386_PC32 __rcu_read_lock
        struct net_generic *ng;
        void *ptr;

        rcu_read_lock();
        ng = rcu_dereference(net->gen);
        BUG_ON(id == 0 || id > ng->len);
     d97:       85 db                   test   %ebx,%ebx
{
        struct net_generic *ng;
        void *ptr;

        rcu_read_lock();
        ng = rcu_dereference(net->gen);
     d99:       8b 86 58 08 00 00       mov    0x858(%esi),%eax			<-- trapping insn


I guess you could avoid the crash if you did

	if (!net)
		return;

in put_pipe_version() but this hardly is the right solution. Someone
else has to make sense of this thing, not me. :-)

HTH.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ