[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFyQntJjtVDJ1BsWGaPA5YY96ZjWJSxz-unjWU-RaQiFjw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 16:03:53 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Linux-Fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] vfs: More precise tests in d_invalidate
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Eric W. Biederman
<ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
>
> Except that today d_invalidate drops the dcache lock and
> calls shrink_dcache_parent. Which gets you into exactly the same
> complex "walk parents and check all siblings" code.
Hmm. It only does that for directories that have sub-entries, though.
I think you may care just about directories (because that's what your
series is about), but d_invalidate() is used for other cases too,
notably d_revalidate() (ie things like stale NFS lookups of normal
files).
That said, I'll have to think about this more. If d_subdir is empty, I
guess d_walk() will be fairly cheap. It's very different, but maybe
not as disastrous as I thought.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists