lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140216112528.GA13853@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.com>
Date:	Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:25:29 +0100
From:	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...hat.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Kent Overstreet <kmo@...erainc.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] percpu_ida: Do not steal all remote CPU tags at once

When stealing from a remote CPU all available tags are moved
from the remote CPU's cache to the stealing CPU's one. Since
the best CPU to steal from is not selected the victim might
actively performing IO and (as result of losing all local
tags) a further cycle of cache rebouncing and/or stealing
could be provoked.

This update is an attempt to soften the described scenario
and limit the number of tags to be stolen at once to the
value of percpu_batch_size.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...hat.com>
Cc: Kent Overstreet <kmo@...erainc.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
---
 lib/percpu_ida.c |   18 ++++++++++--------
 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/percpu_ida.c b/lib/percpu_ida.c
index fad029c..b4c4cc7 100644
--- a/lib/percpu_ida.c
+++ b/lib/percpu_ida.c
@@ -84,20 +84,22 @@ static inline void steal_tags(struct percpu_ida *pool,
 		pool->cpu_last_stolen = cpu;
 		remote = per_cpu_ptr(pool->tag_cpu, cpu);
 
-		cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &pool->cpus_have_tags);
-
-		if (remote == tags)
+		if (remote == tags) {
+			cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &pool->cpus_have_tags);
 			continue;
+		}
 
 		spin_lock(&remote->lock);
 
 		if (remote->nr_free) {
-			memcpy(tags->freelist,
-			       remote->freelist,
-			       sizeof(unsigned) * remote->nr_free);
+			const struct percpu_ida *p = pool;
+
+			move_tags(tags->freelist, &tags->nr_free,
+				  remote->freelist, &remote->nr_free,
+				  min(remote->nr_free, p->percpu_batch_size));
 
-			tags->nr_free = remote->nr_free;
-			remote->nr_free = 0;
+			if (!remote->nr_free)
+				cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &pool->cpus_have_tags);
 		}
 
 		spin_unlock(&remote->lock);
-- 
1.7.7.6

-- 
Regards,
Alexander Gordeev
agordeev@...hat.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ