linux-kernel - Re: Honestly, fork systemd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140216155146.5BCA4C047F@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 16 Feb 2014 15:51:46 +0000
From:	lynxred@...hmail.com
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, debian-devel@...ts.debian.org
Subject: Re: Honestly, fork systemd

No, I will not be converted to systemd just because a few dictators
made a decision.

This needs to be overturned by whoever actually runs the debian
non-profit corporation. I'm sure the tech-ctte isn't the board of
directors.
"Everyone then who hears these words of mine and does them will be
like a wise man who built his house on the rock. And the rain fell,
and the floods came, and the winds blew and beat on that house, but it
did not fall, because it had been founded on the rock. 26 And everyone
who hears these words of mine and does not do them will be like a
foolish man who built his house on the sand. And the rain fell, and
the floods came, and the winds blew and beat against that house, and
it fell, and great was the fall of it."
BDale has no right to make this decision for the rest of us.
But that is just what he did.

The tech-ctte has no right to dictate that we all change
the way we use linux on debian, but that's what four of them did.

*And no one else who is opposed to systemd should accept this either.

Debian is the Universal Operating System.
It is not BDale's OS. It is not Matthias OS. It is not Adrian OS.
It is not Lennart OS.

It is our operating system.
Your four supporters have absolutly no right changing it from
a unix system to a systemD operating system.

You have no right at all.
And you need to be fought and stopped.

>If you insist on alegories, then the choice now stands between
>building on a solitary rock in the middle of a stormy sea or building
>on the sandy beaches of a popular costal town. Often it is easier to
>put in the work to drive down piles trought the sand down to bedrock
>and injecting some concrete where needed to form your own rock
>foundation rather than transport everything to that rocky island. And
>the end result for the users is a much more useful home. > >The
choice in Debian has been made - we like the beachfront property.
>Help us make the best of it - investigate where the sand is weakest
>and inject concrete there, find the bedrock and drive some piles to
>it, add liquifaction protection where that is needed, be
constructive. 
>The house will be build here. If you can help its construction and 
>help it be stronger - please help. If you are going
to continue 
>advocating not building here - please don't. That one is
settled.
 >I personally dislike systemd on a few technical and few
social 
>grounds, but I respect the decision of Debian TC and will do
what I 
>can to make systemd in Debian be the bast it can be and make
Debian 
>with systemd the strongest system it can be. I hope others
will do the same. 
>Best regards,
>    Aigars Mahinovs
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/