[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5301B4AF.1040305@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 15:05:19 +0800
From: Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@...wei.com>
To: <linux@....linux.org.uk>
CC: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>, <will.deacon@....com>,
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"Li Zefan" <lizefan@...wei.com>, Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] ARM: mm: support big-endian page tables
When enable LPAE and big-endian in a hisilicon board, while specify
mem=384M mem=512M@...0M, will get bad page state:
Freeing unused kernel memory: 180K (c0466000 - c0493000)
BUG: Bad page state in process init pfn:fa442
page:c7749840 count:0 mapcount:-1 mapping: (null) index:0x0
page flags: 0x40000400(reserved)
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted 3.10.27+ #66
[<c000f5f0>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0x11c) from [<c000cbc4>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
[<c000cbc4>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) from [<c009e448>] (bad_page+0xd4/0x104)
[<c009e448>] (bad_page+0xd4/0x104) from [<c009e520>] (free_pages_prepare+0xa8/0x14c)
[<c009e520>] (free_pages_prepare+0xa8/0x14c) from [<c009f8ec>] (free_hot_cold_page+0x18/0xf0)
[<c009f8ec>] (free_hot_cold_page+0x18/0xf0) from [<c00b5444>] (handle_pte_fault+0xcf4/0xdc8)
[<c00b5444>] (handle_pte_fault+0xcf4/0xdc8) from [<c00b6458>] (handle_mm_fault+0xf4/0x120)
[<c00b6458>] (handle_mm_fault+0xf4/0x120) from [<c0013754>] (do_page_fault+0xfc/0x354)
[<c0013754>] (do_page_fault+0xfc/0x354) from [<c0008400>] (do_DataAbort+0x2c/0x90)
[<c0008400>] (do_DataAbort+0x2c/0x90) from [<c0008fb4>] (__dabt_usr+0x34/0x40)
The bad pfn:fa442 is not system memory(mem=384M mem=512M@...0M), after debugging,
I find in page fault handler, will get wrong pfn from pte just after set pte,
as follow:
do_anonymous_page()
{
...
set_pte_at(mm, address, page_table, entry);
//debug code
pfn = pte_pfn(entry);
pr_info("pfn:0x%lx, pte:0x%llx\n", pfn, pte_val(entry));
//read out the pte just set
new_pte = pte_offset_map(pmd, address);
new_pfn = pte_pfn(*new_pte);
pr_info("new pfn:0x%lx, new pte:0x%llx\n", pfn, pte_val(entry));
...
}
pfn: 0x1fa4f5, pte:0xc00001fa4f575f
new_pfn:0xfa4f5, new_pte:0xc00000fa4f5f5f //new pfn/pte is wrong.
The bug is happened in cpu_v7_set_pte_ext(ptep, pte):
when pte is 64-bit, for little-endian, will store low 32-bit in r2,
high 32-bit in r3; for big-endian, will store low 32-bit in r3,
high 32-bit in r2, this will cause wrong pfn stored in pte,
so we should exchange r2 and r3 for big-endian.
Signed-off-by: Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@...wei.com>
---
arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-3level.S | 18 +++++++++++++-----
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-3level.S b/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-3level.S
index 01a719e..22e3ad6 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-3level.S
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-3level.S
@@ -64,6 +64,14 @@ ENTRY(cpu_v7_switch_mm)
mov pc, lr
ENDPROC(cpu_v7_switch_mm)
+#ifdef __ARMEB__
+#define rl r3
+#define rh r2
+#else
+#define rl r2
+#define rh r3
+#endif
+
/*
* cpu_v7_set_pte_ext(ptep, pte)
*
@@ -73,13 +81,13 @@ ENDPROC(cpu_v7_switch_mm)
*/
ENTRY(cpu_v7_set_pte_ext)
#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
- tst r2, #L_PTE_VALID
+ tst rl, #L_PTE_VALID
beq 1f
- tst r3, #1 << (57 - 32) @ L_PTE_NONE
- bicne r2, #L_PTE_VALID
+ tst rh, #1 << (57 - 32) @ L_PTE_NONE
+ bicne rl, #L_PTE_VALID
bne 1f
- tst r3, #1 << (55 - 32) @ L_PTE_DIRTY
- orreq r2, #L_PTE_RDONLY
+ tst rh, #1 << (55 - 32) @ L_PTE_DIRTY
+ orreq rl, #L_PTE_RDONLY
1: strd r2, r3, [r0]
ALT_SMP(W(nop))
ALT_UP (mcr p15, 0, r0, c7, c10, 1) @ flush_pte
--
1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists