linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] mfd: Add realtek USB card reader driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 17 Feb 2014 17:16:25 +0800
From:	Roger <rogerable@...ltek.com>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
CC:	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Chris Ball <chris@...ntf.net>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>,
	Alex Dubov <oakad@...oo.com>,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
	<driverdev-devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
	<wei_wang@...lsil.com.cn>, <micky_ching@...lsil.com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] mfd: Add realtek USB card reader driver

On 02/17/2014 04:22 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>>>> From: Roger Tseng <rogerable@...ltek.com>
>>>>
>>>> Realtek USB card reader provides a channel to transfer command or data to flash
>>>> memory cards. This driver exports host instances for mmc and memstick subsystems
>>>> and handles basic works.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Roger Tseng <rogerable@...ltek.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>   drivers/mfd/Kconfig          |  10 +
>>>>   drivers/mfd/Makefile         |   1 +
>>>>   drivers/mfd/rtsx_usb.c       | 760 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>   include/linux/mfd/rtsx_usb.h | 628 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>   4 files changed, 1399 insertions(+)
>>>>   create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/rtsx_usb.c
>>>>   create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/rtsx_usb.h
>>>
>>> Applied again, thanks.
>>>
>> Would you also apply patch 2/3 and 3/3 that to make the device fully
>> operational for users? Or should they be applied by maintainers of
>> mmc/memstick subsystems?
>>
>> Chris, would you give some comment?
>
> I can apply them, but I need the other Maintainer Acks.
>
> If they are build orthogonal i.e. there are no build dependencies
> between them, it's probably better that they go into their associated
> trees separately.
>
I think it would be better to apply them together since the later 
patches really depend on the 1st one,so now we are waiting for Acks from 
mmc/memstick subsystems.

But there is no one specified for "memstick/host/" in MAINTAINERS. Could 
anyone else Ack this?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/