linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: at91: Add at91sam9rl DT SoC support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5301EDB6.9020102@atmel.com>
Date:	Mon, 17 Feb 2014 12:08:38 +0100
From:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
To:	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>
CC:	Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: at91: Add at91sam9rl DT SoC support

On 17/02/2014 11:54, Alexandre Belloni :
> On 17/02/2014 at 11:20:13 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote :
>> Dear Alexandre Belloni,
>>
>> On Sat, 15 Feb 2014 02:14:18 +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
>>
>>> +	model = "Atmel AT91SAM9RL family SoC";
>>> +	compatible = "atmel,at91sam9rl";
>>
>> Since you have it in your board .dts file, I guess you should add the
>> atmel,at91sam9 compatible string here:
>>
>> 	compatible = "atmel,at91sam9rl", "atmel,at91sam9";
> 
> 
> I agree that it would be better but that is not done on other at91sam9
> socs. Nicolas, can you comment ?

I do agree with Thomas. It is true that it is missing in other sam9 dtsi
files.
On the other hand, it is present in sama5d3.dtsi file. So we might have
figured it out at some point ;-)

Bye,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/