[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53021FD9.2070406@elopez.com.ar>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 11:42:33 -0300
From: Emilio López <emilio@...pez.com.ar>
To: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
CC: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] clk: mvebu: fix clk init order
Hi Gregory, Ezequiel,
>> Are we still in time to consider Emilio's oneline proposal?
>> (Emilio: would you mind preparing a suitable patch against dove,
>> kirkwood, armada370/xp, so we can see the real thing?).
The patch is in a common file, so it does not need patching anything for
each platform.
> I am still strongly against this proposal because hard-coded the parent
> clock name in the driver seems very wrong
It is hardcoded already when the parent is registered, so I do not
understand your concern.
http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/clk/mvebu/common.c?v=3.13#L34
> and moreover in some circumstances
> (if there is no output-name, which is our default case) this proposal
> just ignored the parent clock given by the device tree and this looked
> more wrong.
I have sent a second patch addressing this comment, but you do not seem
to have taken too serious a look at it.
http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg305922.html
Cheers,
Emilio
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists