[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <DEE24522-5DD2-4C42-9DD9-EC18F0FF05D8@primarydata.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 11:46:53 -0500
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>
To: shaobingqing <shaobingqing@...tor.com.cn>
Cc: linuxnfs <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] NFSv4.1: new layout stateid can not be overwrite by one out of date
On Feb 17, 2014, at 2:08, shaobingqing <shaobingqing@...tor.com.cn> wrote:
> If initiate_file_draining returned NFS4ERR_DELAY, all the lsegs of
> a file might be released before the retrying cb_layout request arriving
> at the client. In this situation,the list lo->plh_segs is empty,
> layoutget request of the file will use open stateid to obtain a new
> layout stateid. And if the retrying cb_layout request arrived at the
> client after the layoutget reply, new layout stateid would be overwrite
> by one out of date.
I have very serious doubts about adding layout state to represent what the server is _trying_ to do. What if the server decides not to retry the recall? What if it reboots?
Let’s start with looking at the motivations: Have you ever run into the above problem in practice? If so, what was the effect on overall performance?
_________________________________
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer, PrimaryData
trond.myklebust@...marydata.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists