[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140217181451.7EB7FC4044D@trevor.secretlab.ca>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 18:14:51 +0000
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>
To: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@...sung.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] [media]: of: move graph helpers from drivers/media/v4l2-core to drivers/of
On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 07:56:33 -0600, Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 5:45 AM, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> > From: Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@...il.com>
> >
> > This patch moves the parsing helpers used to parse connected graphs
> > in the device tree, like the video interface bindings documented in
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/video-interfaces.txt, from
> > drivers/media/v4l2-core to drivers/of.
>
> This is the opposite direction things have been moving...
>
> > This allows to reuse the same parser code from outside the V4L2 framework,
> > most importantly from display drivers. There have been patches that duplicate
> > the code (and I am going to send one of my own), such as
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2013-August/043308.html
> > and others that parse the same binding in a different way:
> > https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@vger.kernel.org/msg100761.html
> >
> > I think that all common video interface parsing helpers should be moved to a
> > single place, outside of the specific subsystems, so that it can be reused
> > by all drivers.
>
> Perhaps that should be done rather than moving to drivers/of now and
> then again to somewhere else.
This is just parsing helpers though, isn't it? I have no problem pulling
helper functions into drivers/of if they are usable by multiple
subsystems. I don't really understand the model being used though. I
would appreciate a description of the usage model for these functions
for poor folks like me who can't keep track of what is going on in
subsystems.
g.
>
> > I moved v4l2_of_get_next_endpoint, v4l2_of_get_remote_port,
> > and v4l2_of_get_remote_port_parent. They are renamed to
> > of_graph_get_next_endpoint, of_graph_get_remote_port, and
> > of_graph_get_remote_port_parent, respectively.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
> > ---
> > drivers/media/Kconfig | 1 +
> > drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-of.c | 117 ---------------------------------
> > drivers/of/Kconfig | 3 +
> > drivers/of/Makefile | 1 +
> > drivers/of/of_graph.c | 133 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/linux/of_graph.h | 23 +++++++
> > include/media/v4l2-of.h | 16 ++---
> > 7 files changed, 167 insertions(+), 127 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 drivers/of/of_graph.c
> > create mode 100644 include/linux/of_graph.h
>
> [snip]
>
> > diff --git a/include/media/v4l2-of.h b/include/media/v4l2-of.h
> > index 541cea4..404a493 100644
> > --- a/include/media/v4l2-of.h
> > +++ b/include/media/v4l2-of.h
> > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> > #include <linux/list.h>
> > #include <linux/types.h>
> > #include <linux/errno.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_graph.h>
> >
> > #include <media/v4l2-mediabus.h>
> >
> > @@ -72,11 +73,6 @@ struct v4l2_of_endpoint {
> > #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> > int v4l2_of_parse_endpoint(const struct device_node *node,
> > struct v4l2_of_endpoint *endpoint);
> > -struct device_node *v4l2_of_get_next_endpoint(const struct device_node *parent,
> > - struct device_node *previous);
> > -struct device_node *v4l2_of_get_remote_port_parent(
> > - const struct device_node *node);
> > -struct device_node *v4l2_of_get_remote_port(const struct device_node *node);
> > #else /* CONFIG_OF */
> >
> > static inline int v4l2_of_parse_endpoint(const struct device_node *node,
> > @@ -85,25 +81,25 @@ static inline int v4l2_of_parse_endpoint(const struct device_node *node,
> > return -ENOSYS;
> > }
> >
> > +#endif /* CONFIG_OF */
> > +
> > static inline struct device_node *v4l2_of_get_next_endpoint(
> > const struct device_node *parent,
> > struct device_node *previous)
> > {
> > - return NULL;
> > + return of_graph_get_next_endpoint(parent, previous);
>
> Won't this break for !OF?
>
> Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists