lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140217181854.GA7119@kroah.com>
Date:	Mon, 17 Feb 2014 10:18:54 -0800
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Stanislav Meduna <stano@...una.org>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	hjk@...sjkoch.de
Subject: Re: UIO and memory from dma_alloc_coherent - UIO_MEM_PHYS?

On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 07:06:37PM +0100, Stanislav Meduna wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> what is the correct way for a UIO driver to pass a memory allocated
> using dma_alloc_coherent to userspace? I have googled for examples
> but I was not able to find a definitive answer.
> 
> My device needs two 128 kB chunks of DMA-able memory. First I tried
> 
>   pdev->tx_vaddr = dma_zalloc_coherent(&dev->dev, pdev->dma_len,
>                      &pdev->tx_paddr, GFP_KERNEL | GFP_DMA);
> 
>   info->mem[2].name = "txdma";
>   info->mem[2].addr = (phys_addr_t) pdev->tx_vaddr;
>   info->mem[2].size = pdev->dma_len;
>   info->mem[2].memtype = UIO_MEM_LOGICAL;
> 
> This seemed to work at the first try, but tends to panic in various
> ways when unmapping. It probably only maps the first page or something
> like that and accessing past some limit overwrites something.

Have you tried the uio_dmem_genirq.c driver?  Or are you writing a new
one?

> If I change this to
> 
>   info->mem[2].addr = (phys_addr_t) pdev->tx_paddr;
>   info->mem[2].memtype = UIO_MEM_PHYS;
> 
> it seems to work at least on x86 with < 4GB memory. The uio_pruss.c
> (or uio_dmem_genirq.c in newer kernels) do this as well.
> 
> I have a bad feeling here - if I am allocating something that
> is a virtual memory in the kernel, I don't expect to pretend I am
> accessing something else. The UIO howto explicitely states
> that UIO_MEM_PHYS is meant for a "physical memory on your card".
> 
> Is this really a recommended way of doing this and is it portable
> to other architectures?
> 
> I am using 3.4 kernel with realtime patches.

The uio_dmem_genirq.c driver showed up in 3.8, so it might be good for
you to update your kernel if you want to do DMA memory with a UIO
driver, as lots of other things in this area was fixed to accomplish
this.

Hope this helps,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ