[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140217181953.297FBC40372@trevor.secretlab.ca>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 18:19:53 +0000
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>
To: Josh Cartwright <joshc@...eaurora.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: Turn of_match_node into a static inline when CONFIG_OF isn't set
On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:48:26 -0600, Josh Cartwright <joshc@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 03:55:35PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hi Josh,
> >
> > On Tuesday 11 February 2014 08:41:08 Josh Cartwright wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 01:36:51PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > > when CONFIG_OF is disabled of_match_node is defined as a macro that
> > > > evaluates to NULL. This breaks compilation of drivers that dereference
> > > > the function's return value directly. Fix it by turning the macro into a
> > > > static inline function that returns NULL.
> > >
> > > Just this past week I did the same thing, but noticed that it breaks the
> > > following usecase:
> > >
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> > > static const struct of_device_id foobar_matches[] = {
> > > { .compatible = "foobar,whatsit", },
> > > { },
> > > };
> > > #endif
> > >
> > > static int probeme(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > {
> > > struct of_device_id *id;
> > >
> > > id = of_match_node(foobar_matches, pdev->dev.of_node);
> > > if (id) {
> > > /* ... */
> > > }
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > When !CONFIG_OF and with your change, this will fail to build due to
> > > foobar_matches being undefined.
> >
> > Good point. What would you think about
> >
> > #define of_match_node(_matches, _node) ((const struct of_device_id *)NULL)
>
> I've just sent out a patchset that cleans up at least a couple of users
> that directly do of_match_node(matches, np)->data using
> of_find_matching_node_and_match. Not sure if that will fix the usage
> you have in mind, though.
>
> I am a bit weary about having an of_match_node() user that both directly
> dereferences the result (i.e. of_match_node(matches, np)->data) _and_
> builds when !CONFIG_OF; most likely due to a traumatic childhood event
> where demons flew out my nose.
As is supposed to happen when code dereferrences pointers blindly.
g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists