[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1392672959-6386-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 13:35:48 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, darren@...art.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
oleg@...hat.com, sbw@....edu,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/12] rcu: Add ACCESS_ONCE() to ->n_force_qs_lh accesses
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
The ->n_force_qs_lh field is accessed without the benefit of any
synchronization, so this commit adds the needed ACCESS_ONCE() wrappers.
Yes, increments to ->n_force_qs_lh can be lost, but contention should
be low and the field is strictly statistical in nature, so this is not
a problem.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 4 ++--
kernel/rcu/tree_trace.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index b3d116cd072d..e64157798624 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -2304,7 +2304,7 @@ static void force_quiescent_state(struct rcu_state *rsp)
if (rnp_old != NULL)
raw_spin_unlock(&rnp_old->fqslock);
if (ret) {
- rsp->n_force_qs_lh++;
+ ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->n_force_qs_lh)++;
return;
}
rnp_old = rnp;
@@ -2316,7 +2316,7 @@ static void force_quiescent_state(struct rcu_state *rsp)
smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
raw_spin_unlock(&rnp_old->fqslock);
if (ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->gp_flags) & RCU_GP_FLAG_FQS) {
- rsp->n_force_qs_lh++;
+ ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->n_force_qs_lh)++;
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp_old->lock, flags);
return; /* Someone beat us to it. */
}
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_trace.c b/kernel/rcu/tree_trace.c
index 4def475336d4..d1f1e64a6d72 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_trace.c
@@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ static void print_one_rcu_state(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_state *rsp)
seq_printf(m, "nfqs=%lu/nfqsng=%lu(%lu) fqlh=%lu oqlen=%ld/%ld\n",
rsp->n_force_qs, rsp->n_force_qs_ngp,
rsp->n_force_qs - rsp->n_force_qs_ngp,
- rsp->n_force_qs_lh, rsp->qlen_lazy, rsp->qlen);
+ ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->n_force_qs_lh), rsp->qlen_lazy, rsp->qlen);
for (rnp = &rsp->node[0]; rnp - &rsp->node[0] < rcu_num_nodes; rnp++) {
if (rnp->level != level) {
seq_puts(m, "\n");
--
1.8.1.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists