| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 10:51:17 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Refactor cpufreq_set_policy()
On 17 February 2014 06:36, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
> Reduce the rampant usage of goto and the indentation level in
> cpufreq_set_policy() to improve the readability of that code.
>
> No functional changes should result from that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 102 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -2018,22 +2018,21 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpufreq_get_policy);
> static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> struct cpufreq_policy *new_policy)
> {
> - int ret = 0, failed = 1;
> + struct cpufreq_governor *old_gov;
> + int ret;
>
> pr_debug("setting new policy for CPU %u: %u - %u kHz\n", new_policy->cpu,
> new_policy->min, new_policy->max);
>
> memcpy(&new_policy->cpuinfo, &policy->cpuinfo, sizeof(policy->cpuinfo));
>
> - if (new_policy->min > policy->max || new_policy->max < policy->min) {
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - goto error_out;
> - }
> + if (new_policy->min > policy->max || new_policy->max < policy->min)
> + return -EINVAL;
>
> /* verify the cpu speed can be set within this limit */
> ret = cpufreq_driver->verify(new_policy);
> if (ret)
> - goto error_out;
> + return ret;
>
> /* adjust if necessary - all reasons */
> blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list,
> @@ -2049,7 +2048,7 @@ static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpu
> */
> ret = cpufreq_driver->verify(new_policy);
> if (ret)
> - goto error_out;
> + return ret;
>
> /* notification of the new policy */
> blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list,
> @@ -2064,58 +2063,47 @@ static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpu
> if (cpufreq_driver->setpolicy) {
> policy->policy = new_policy->policy;
> pr_debug("setting range\n");
> - ret = cpufreq_driver->setpolicy(new_policy);
> - } else {
> - if (new_policy->governor != policy->governor) {
> - /* save old, working values */
> - struct cpufreq_governor *old_gov = policy->governor;
> -
> - pr_debug("governor switch\n");
> -
> - /* end old governor */
> - if (policy->governor) {
> - __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP);
> - up_write(&policy->rwsem);
> - __cpufreq_governor(policy,
> - CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT);
> - down_write(&policy->rwsem);
> - }
> -
> - /* start new governor */
> - policy->governor = new_policy->governor;
> - if (!__cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_INIT)) {
> - if (!__cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START)) {
> - failed = 0;
> - } else {
> - up_write(&policy->rwsem);
> - __cpufreq_governor(policy,
> - CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT);
> - down_write(&policy->rwsem);
> - }
> - }
> -
> - if (failed) {
> - /* new governor failed, so re-start old one */
> - pr_debug("starting governor %s failed\n",
> - policy->governor->name);
> - if (old_gov) {
> - policy->governor = old_gov;
> - __cpufreq_governor(policy,
> - CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_INIT);
> - __cpufreq_governor(policy,
> - CPUFREQ_GOV_START);
> - }
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - goto error_out;
> - }
> - /* might be a policy change, too, so fall through */
> - }
> - pr_debug("governor: change or update limits\n");
> - ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
> + return cpufreq_driver->setpolicy(new_policy);
> }
Maybe a blank line here..
> + if (new_policy->governor == policy->governor)
> + goto out;
Otherwise: Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists