[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140218090454.GA18502@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 09:04:54 +0000
From: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com, eric.y.miao@...il.com,
dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, lgirdwood@...il.com,
haojian.zhuang@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
peter.ujfalusi@...com, cw00.choi@...sung.com,
myungjoo.ham@...sung.com, linux@....linux.org.uk,
jarkko.nikula@...mer.com
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 02/15] ASoC: dapm: Add locked version of
snd_soc_dapm_xxxx_pin functions
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 09:30:30AM +0900, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 06:06:03PM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>
> > Hm, this is a bit confusing. For other functions in ASoC when we
> > have a pair of functions with the _locked suffix and without the one
> > with _locked takes the lock, the other one doesn't. E.g.
> > snd_soc_update_bits_locked. Here we do it the other way around.
>
> Yes, this is definitely confusing. The existing naming might not be the
> best but making things inconsistent isn't going to help the situation
> either.
Oops... sorry that was not intentional I will respin to correct
this.
Thanks,
Charles
> _______________________________________________
> Alsa-devel mailing list
> Alsa-devel@...a-project.org
> http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists