[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140218003555.GJ2669@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 09:35:55 +0900
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
Cc: Yadwinder Singh Brar <yadi.brar01@...il.com>,
Sangbeom Kim <sbkim73@...sung.com>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/14] regulator: s2mps11: Add opmode for S2MPS14
regulators
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 09:07:34AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> The low power maps to REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE or REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY
> (depending on the understanding of "more efficient" and "most efficient"
> for light loads). However the suspend mode of S5M8767/S2MPS14 is more
> like automatic regulator disable by SoC.
I don't understand the above? Are you saying that suspend mode actually
turns off the regulator or something else? If it's a separate setting
for suspend mode then it should be using the core suspend mode stuff.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists