[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53033433.7080002@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 11:21:39 +0100
From: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@...aro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
CC: lenb@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ACPI, PCI, ISA: Fix memory leak when there is no
IRQ in the ACPI subsystem.
On 18.02.2014 02:02, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, February 10, 2014 02:00:11 PM Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
>> Whenever we register ISA interrupt or not, we need to free the IRQ routing
>> table entry.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@...aro.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c
>> index b0e31b6..6ec0f36 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c
>> @@ -432,6 +432,7 @@ int acpi_pci_irq_enable(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> #endif
>> dev_warn(&dev->dev, "PCI INT %c: no GSI\n", pin_name(pin));
>>
>> + kfree(entry);
>
> If I'm not mistaken, entry is always NULL here, isn't it?
acpi_pci_link_allocate_irq() can return negative gsi even if entry !=
NULL. For that case we'd have memory leak.
>
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists