linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 08/21] perf, c2c: Rework setup code to prepare for features

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140218130223.GH4343@krava.brq.redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 18 Feb 2014 14:02:23 +0100
From:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:	Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
Cc:	acme@...stprotocols.net, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	jmario@...hat.com, fowles@...each.com, eranian@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/21] perf, c2c: Rework setup code to prepare for
 features

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:29:03PM -0500, Don Zickus wrote:
> A basic patch that re-arranges some of the c2c code and adds a couple
> of small features to lay the ground work for the rest of the patch
> series.
> 
> Changes include:
> 
> o reworking the report path
> o creating an initial entry struct
> o replace preprocess_sample with simpler calls
> o rework raw output to handle separators
> o remove phys id gunk
> o add some generic options
> 
> There isn't much meat in this patch just a bunch of code movement and cleanups.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
> ---

SNIP

>  static int perf_c2c__process_sample(struct perf_tool *tool,
>  				    union perf_event *event,
> @@ -153,20 +198,63 @@ static int perf_c2c__process_sample(struct perf_tool *tool,
>  				    struct machine *machine)
>  {
>  	struct perf_c2c *c2c = container_of(tool, struct perf_c2c, tool);
> -	struct addr_location al;
> -	int err = 0;
> +	u8 cpumode = event->header.misc & PERF_RECORD_MISC_CPUMODE_MASK;
> +	struct mem_info *mi;
> +	struct thread *thread;
> +	struct c2c_entry *entry;
> +	sample_handler f;
> +	int err = -1;
> +
> +	if (evsel->handler.func == NULL)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	thread = machine__find_thread(machine, sample->tid);
> +	if (thread == NULL)
> +		goto err;
> +
> +	mi = machine__resolve_mem(machine, thread, sample, cpumode);
> +	if (mi == NULL)
> +		goto err;
>  
> -	if (perf_event__preprocess_sample(event, machine, &al, sample) < 0) {
> -		pr_err("problem processing %d event, skipping it.\n",
> -		       event->header.type);
> -		return -1;
> +	if (c2c->raw_records) {
> +		perf_sample__fprintf(sample, ' ', "raw input", mi, stdout);
> +		free(mi);
> +		return 0;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (evsel->handler.func != NULL) {
> -		sample_handler f = evsel->handler.func;
> -		err = f(c2c, sample, &al);
> +	entry = c2c_entry__new(sample, thread, mi, cpumode);
> +	if (entry == NULL)
> +		goto err_mem;
> +
> +	f = evsel->handler.func;
> +	err = f(c2c, sample, entry);
> +	if (err)
> +		goto err_entry;
> +
> +	return 0;

this looks like new mode for namhyung's iterator patchset
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=138967747319160&w=2

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/namhyung/linux-perf.git
perf/cumulate-v8

jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/