linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 04/17 v2] ASoC: dapm: Add unlocked version of snd_soc_dapm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <530386E3.2030405@metafoo.de>
Date:	Tue, 18 Feb 2014 17:14:27 +0100
From:	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
To:	Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CC:	broonie@...nel.org, myungjoo.ham@...sung.com,
	cw00.choi@...sung.com, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com,
	lgirdwood@...il.com, peter.ujfalusi@...com,
	jarkko.nikula@...mer.com, eric.y.miao@...il.com,
	haojian.zhuang@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
	linux@....linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/17 v2] ASoC: dapm: Add unlocked version of snd_soc_dapm_sync

On 02/18/2014 04:22 PM, Charles Keepax wrote:
> We will often call sync after several functions that require the DAPM
> mutex to be held. Rather than release and immediately relock the mutex
> provide an unlocked function for this situation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>

We should add lockdep_assert() to the unlocked versions to catch broken 
users, but that can be done in a follow-up patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/