linux-kernel - Re: btrfs "possible irq lock inversion dependency detected"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140218162736.GG16073@twin.jikos.cz>
Date:	Tue, 18 Feb 2014 17:27:36 +0100
From:	David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>
To:	Chris Murphy <lists@...orremedies.com>
Cc:	Tommi Rantala <tt.rantala@...il.com>, Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
	Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, trinity@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: btrfs "possible irq lock inversion dependency detected"

On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 03:14:34PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Looks like this is the same thing previously report on Btrfs list with 3.14.0-rc1 here:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062439
> 
> Which points to this:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062833#c24
> 
> Which points to this patch:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=139233546723342&q=raw

Thanks for the pointer, so it's not a btrfs bug.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/