linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] pfuze100-regulator: Revert "regulator: pfuze100: Use of_get_child_by

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 18 Feb 2014 21:58:52 +0530
From:	Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>
To:	Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>
Cc:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
	festevam@...il.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pfuze100-regulator: Revert "regulator: pfuze100: Use of_get_child_by_name"

On 18 February 2014 21:20, Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@...escale.com> wrote:
> Since commit d7857c42 (regulator: pfuze100: Use of_get_child_by_name) we get
> the following probe failure:
>
> pfuze100-regulator 1-0008: Full layer: 1, Metal layer: 0
> pfuze100-regulator 1-0008: FAB: 0, FIN: 0
> pfuze100-regulator 1-0008: regulators node not found
> pfuze100-regulator: probe of 1-0008 failed with error -22
>
> Revert the offending commit so that we can probe the regulator successfully.

I wonder what is different in this case from the ones that I already
have working
that is causing this to fail. Can you please tell me which dts file
you have used
so that I can see if the way the node is defined is anything different.

 ---
With warm regards,
Sachin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/