[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140218164614.GI21483@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 16:46:14 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Alessandro Rubini <rubini@...pv.it>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Chris Ball <chris@...ntf.net>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-spi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/17] mmc: mmci: Mask IRQs for all variants during
runtime suspend
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 05:36:52PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> If we add SDIO irq support to mmci in future; parts of that
> implementation includes a re-route of DAT1 to a GPIO irq when entering
> runtime suspend state. The mmci HW will in runtime suspend state, not
> be responsible for handling irqs, which is the same as of today.
Note that the "irq thread" in sdio_irq is scheduled for destruction -
it's buggy when the system is under high load and a driver claims a
SDIO irq. Sched people hate it too...
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: 5.8Mbps down 500kbps up. Estimation
in database were 13.1 to 19Mbit for a good line, about 7.5+ for a bad.
Estimate before purchase was "up to 13.2Mbit".
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists