lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <xa1t8ut8wc2f.fsf@mina86.com>
Date:	Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:44:08 +0100
From:	Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>
To:	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] Circular locking dependency - DRM/CMA/MM/hotplug/...

> On 2014-02-12 17:33, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> What if we did these changes:
>>
>> struct page *dma_alloc_from_contiguous(struct device *dev, int count,
>>                                         unsigned int align)
>> {
>> ...
>>          mutex_lock(&cma_mutex);
>> ...
>>          for (;;) {
>>                  pageno = bitmap_find_next_zero_area(cma->bitmap, cma->count,
>>                                                      start, count, mask);
>>                  if (pageno >= cma->count)
>>                          break;
>>
>>                  pfn = cma->base_pfn + pageno;
>> +               bitmap_set(cma->bitmap, pageno, count);
>> +               mutex_unlock(&cma_mutex);
>>                  ret = alloc_contig_range(pfn, pfn + count, MIGRATE_CMA);
>> +               mutex_lock(&cma_mutex);
>>                  if (ret == 0) {
>> -                       bitmap_set(cma->bitmap, pageno, count);
>>                          page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
>>                          break;
>> -               } else if (ret != -EBUSY) {
>> +		}
>> +		bitmap_clear(cma->bitmap, pageno, count);
>> +		if (ret != -EBUSY) {
>>                          break;
>>                  }
>> ...
>>          mutex_unlock(&cma_mutex);
>>          pr_debug("%s(): returned %p\n", __func__, page);
>>          return page;
>> }

Like Marek said, this will fail if two concurrent calls to
alloc_contig_range are made such that they operate on the same pageblock
(which is possible as the allocated regions do not need to be pageblock
aligned).

Another mutex could be added just for this one call, but as I understand
this would not solve the problem.

>> bool dma_release_from_contiguous(struct device *dev, struct page *pages,
>>                                   int count)
>> {
>> ...
>> +       free_contig_range(pfn, count);
>>          mutex_lock(&cma_mutex);
>>          bitmap_clear(cma->bitmap, pfn - cma->base_pfn, count);
>> -       free_contig_range(pfn, count);
>>          mutex_unlock(&cma_mutex);
>> ...
>> }

This *should* be fine.  Didn't test it.

-- 
Best regards,                                         _     _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of      o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science,  Michał “mina86” Nazarewicz    (o o)
ooo +--<mpn@...gle.com>--<xmpp:mina86@...ber.org>--ooO--(_)--Ooo--


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (836 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ