linux-kernel - Re: [RFC, PATCHv2 0/2] mm: map few pages around fault address if they are in page cache

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFxxRjw7gi0ahjyydAvEPK+ASk_ORt+r7OyA0TUFS0O94Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 18 Feb 2014 09:51:44 -0800
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc:	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@...el.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCHv2 0/2] mm: map few pages around fault address if they
 are in page cache

On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 5:28 AM, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> What would the direct io code do when it runs into a page with
> elevated mapcount, but for which a mapping cannot be found yet?

Actually, you cannot get into that situation, since the definition of
"found" is that you have to follow the page tables (remember: this is
a *file* mapping, not an anonymous one, so you don't actually have an
rmap list, you have the inode mapping list).

And since we hold the page table lock, you cannot actually get to the
point where you see that it's not mapped yet. See?

That said:

> Looking at the code, it looks like the above scheme could cause
> some trouble with invalidate_inode_pages2_range(), which has
> the following sequence:
>
>                         if (page_mapped(page)) {
>                                 ... unmap page
>                         }
>                         BUG_ON(page_mapped(page));

The BUG_ON() itself could trigger, because it could race with us
optimistically trying to increment the page mapping code. And yes, we
might have to remove that.

But the actual "unmap page" logic should not be able to ever see any
difference.

See my argument?

              Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/