[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140218190730.GG31116@joshc.qualcomm.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 13:07:30 -0600
From: Josh Cartwright <joshc@...eaurora.org>
To: "Ivan T. Ivanov" <iivanov@...sol.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] usb: chipidea: msm: Add device tree binding
information
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 07:27:00PM +0200, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 10:13 -0600, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 03:21:19PM +0200, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
> > > .../devicetree/bindings/usb/msm-hsusb.txt | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> >
> > Is this really the appropriate place to document this? It seems like
> > this binding doc should be merged with the i.MX ci13xxx binding in a
> > common ci13xxx doc.
> >
>
> This driver is a "glue" layer driver which control Qualcomm
> specific logic around Chipidea IP core. It is supposed to
> hold "non standard" Chipidea properties, but I suppose that
> ci-hdrc-qcom.txt will be better name and will be similar to
> i.MX chosen name.
>
> What do you think?
Sounds like an improvement to me.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists