[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1392751709.4640.371.camel@X1Carbon.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 23:28:29 +0400
From: Igor Gnatenko <i.gnatenko.brain@...il.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Peter Weber <bugs@...honey.com>,
Lennart Poettering <lennart@...ttering.net>,
Kevin Smith <thirdwiggin@...il.com>,
Rinat Ibragimov <ibragimovrinat@...l.ru>, sov.info@...l.ru,
Thomas Christensen <christensenthomas@...il.com>,
Vladimir Sherenkov <a_12300@...l.ru>,
ACPI Devel Mailing List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org"
<platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
"intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] ACPI / video: Add systems that should favour native
backlight interface
On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 16:22 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 02:31:46 PM Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > At Tue, 18 Feb 2014 12:34:42 +0200,
> > Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 01:54:20PM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> > > > + {
> > > > + .callback = video_set_use_native_backlight,
> > > > + .ident = "HP EliteBook 2013 models",
> > > > + .matches = {
> > > > + DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "Hewlett-Packard"),
> > > > + DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "HP EliteBook "),
> > > > + DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, " G1"),
> > > > + },
> > > > + },
> > >
> > > I see my device is listed here but the above doesn't really use native
> > > backlight because it is still in acpi_osi blacklist. Tried this and I can
> > > see both acpi_video0 and intel_backlight listed under /sys/class/backlight.
> > > Was this the intention?
> >
> > The acpi_osi blacklist commit (2d4054d84224) has to be reverted, as I
> > mentioned earlier. But the revert can be done individually after
> > merging this patch. Rafael, could you care?
>
> Done. Please check the result in linux-pm.git/linux-next.
Is it will merge to 3.14 ?
P.S. why you don't using rafael@ mail ? *joke*
>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
>
--
-Igor Gnatenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists