lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140218023659.GV12219@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 17 Feb 2014 18:36:59 -0800
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 03/11] perf: Allow for multiple ring buffers per event

> I'm not convinced it needs to be a PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE; but some
> PERF_RECORD_* type for sure. 

Adding a header shouldn't be a problem, it's merely wasting 4K.

> Also it must allow interleaving with other > events.

But can you describe a concrete use case where interleaving is better?

I'm not aware of any. Anything that could be usefully interleaved
can just be in the side band stream, and if you want a unified uncompressed 
stream you just run perf inject. The standard tools don't care for 
it as they have to reorder everything anyways to deal with multi
CPU reordering.

Your scheme is very complex and adds a lot of use restrictions 
over the current code, so there should be a good reason for it
at least.

Especially the TLB hac^wproposal sounds horrible to me, compared
to the straight forward zero copy ring buffer used today.

-Andi

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ