linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] intel_pstate updates for v3.14-rcX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2705558.gK5sRhMz43@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:	Tue, 18 Feb 2014 23:27:11 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:	Dirk Brandewie <dirk.brandewie@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, dirk.j.brandewie@...el.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] intel_pstate updates for v3.14-rcX

On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 12:29:54 PM Dirk Brandewie wrote:
> Hi Rafael,

Hi,

> On 02/12/2014 10:01 AM, dirk.brandewie@...il.com wrote:
> > From: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@...el.com>
> >
> > Based on v3.14-rc2
> >
> > Patch 1 removes energy reporting the patch from Maurizio Lambardi
> >   intel_pstate: fix race condition in intel_pstate_init() can be dropped.
> >
> 
> Any reason why patches 2-5 did not make rc3 other than timing?
> 
> Patches 2/3 can easily wait for v3.15.x
> 
> Patches 4/5 fix bugs that are in the wild.

I asked you about them, but you didn't reply:

http://marc.info/?l=linux-pm&m=139225158531023&w=4

Again, do patches [4-5/5] depend on [2-3/5]?

If not, I can queue them up for -rc4.

Thanks,
Rafael

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/