[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1455643.Gytp1zkkCW@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 23:36:16 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nm@...com,
kgene.kim@...sung.com, jinchoi@...adcom.com, tianyu.lan@...el.com,
sebastian.capella@...aro.org, jhbird.choi@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 0/7] cpufreq: suspend early/resume late: dpm_{suspend|resume}()
On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 01:30:52 PM Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 02/17/2014 02:25 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > This patchset creates/calls cpufreq suspend/resume callbacks from dpm_{suspend|resume}()
> > for handling suspend/resume of cpufreq governors and core.
> >
> > There are multiple problems that are fixed by this patch:
> > - Nishanth Menon (TI) found an interesting problem on his platform, OMAP. His board
> > wasn't working well with suspend/resume as calls for removing non-boot CPUs
> > was turning out into a call to drivers ->target() which then tries to play
> > with regulators. But regulators and their I2C bus were already suspended and
> > this resulted in a failure. Many platforms have such problems, samsung, tegra,
> > etc.. They solved it with driver specific PM notifiers where they used to
> > disable their driver's ->target() routine.
> > - Lan Tianyu (Intel) & Jinhyuk Choi (Broadcom) found an issue where tunables
> > configuration for clusters/sockets with non-boot CPUs was getting lost after
> > suspend/resume, as we were notifying governors with CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT on
> > removal of the last cpu for that policy and so deallocating memory for
> > tunables. This is fixed by this patch as we don't allow any operation on
> > governors after device suspend and before device resume now.
>
> The series,
> Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
Is this series necessary to fix bugs that you're seeing in 3.14-rc and if so,
the what bugs are they?
> Patch 7/7,
> Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
>
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists