[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5302C8AB.8070401@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 10:42:51 +0800
From: Michael wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] sched: make sure sched-priority after invoke idle_balance()
On 02/17/2014 07:24 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
[snip]
>> Since idle_balance() won't happen in the loop, may be we could use:
>>
>> if p && p->sched_class == class
>> return p
>>
>> in here, let it fall down into the loop if p is idle, since that means
>> we got RT/DL and will do this anyway, could save two jump work may be?
>> (and may could combine some code below if so?)
>
> Maybe; we'd have to look at whatever GCC does with it.
Exactly, alien code appear when in binary...
Regards,
Michael Wang
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists