[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1402181441360.20772@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 14:46:01 -0800 (PST)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
David Cohen <david.a.cohen@...ux.intel.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Damien Ramonda <damien.ramonda@...el.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Linus <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
nacc@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 ] mm readahead: Fix readahead fail for memoryless cpu
and limit readahead pages
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > I'm not sure I understand why we want to be independent of PAGE_SIZE since
> > we're still relying on PAGE_CACHE_SIZE. Don't you mean to do
> >
> > #define MAX_READAHEAD ((512*PAGE_SIZE)/PAGE_CACHE_SIZE)
>
> MAX_READAHEAD is in units of "pages".
>
> This:
>
> +#define MAX_READAHEAD ((512*4096)/PAGE_CACHE_SIZE)
>
> means "two megabytes", and is implemented in a way to ensure that
> MAX_READAHEAD=2mb on 4k pagesize as well as on 64k pagesize. Because
> we don't want variations in PAGE_SIZE to cause alterations in readahead
> behavior.
>
Ah, ok, so 2MB is the magic value that we limit readhead to on all
architectures. 512 * 4096 is a strange way to write 2MB, but ok :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists