linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] fs: xattr: Don't display attributes without read access

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 18 Feb 2014 15:16:50 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>
Cc:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] fs: xattr: Don't display attributes without read
 access

On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 20:31:01 +0800 Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be> wrote:

> Any user can display extented attribute names without read
> access.
> 
> eg: attr -l <filename>
> 
> This patch checks inode_permission in listxattr common
> function before executing vfs_listxattr.
> 
> ...
>
> --- a/fs/xattr.c
> +++ b/fs/xattr.c
> @@ -543,6 +543,10 @@ listxattr(struct dentry *d, char __user *list, size_t size)
>  	char *klist = NULL;
>  	char *vlist = NULL;	/* If non-NULL, we used vmalloc() */
>  
> +	error = inode_permission(d->d_inode, MAY_READ);
> +	if (error)
> +		return error;
> +
>  	if (size) {
>  		if (size > XATTR_LIST_MAX)
>  			size = XATTR_LIST_MAX;

erk.  Doesn't this mean that if existing userspace is relying on the
current behaviour, this patch will cause breakage?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/