linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] mfd: add bcm590xx pmu DT binding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 19 Feb 2014 13:47:26 +0900
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Matt Porter <mporter@...aro.org>
Cc:	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Christian Daudt <bcm@...thebug.org>,
	Devicetree List <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux ARM Kernel List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] mfd: add bcm590xx pmu DT binding

On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 06:17:08PM -0500, Matt Porter wrote:

> +
> +				rfldo_reg: regulator@0 {
> +					reg = <0>;

What do these reg values mean, they don't seem to be documented in the
binding?

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)