[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5856987.3qKttR09W1@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 01:58:59 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: dirk.brandewie@...il.com
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] intel_pstate: Use LFM bus ratio as min ratio/P state
On Wednesday, February 12, 2014 10:01:06 AM dirk.brandewie@...il.com wrote:
> From: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@...el.com>
>
> Using LFM ratio provides better perf/watt vs min ratio.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@...el.com>
This changelog is particularly insufficient.
Can you please explain what's wrong with the previous calculation and how
the change makes it better?
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> index b80c03d..ff45ce1 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> @@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ static int byt_get_min_pstate(void)
> {
> u64 value;
> rdmsrl(BYT_RATIOS, value);
> - return value & 0xFF;
> + return (value >> 8) & 0xFF;
> }
>
> static int byt_get_max_pstate(void)
>
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists