[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1392772341.10088.56.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 01:12:21 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
Cc: Sebastian Reichel <sre@...ian.org>,
Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>,
Ивайло Димитров
<freemangordon@....bg>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org development"
<linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Bluetooth: Add hci_h4p driver
On Sat, 2014-02-15 at 23:30 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > >> > Firmware files are available for download from nemo project:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > https://api.merproject.org/public/source/nemo:devel:hw:ti:om
> > > >> > ap3:n900/bcm-bt-firmware/bcm-bt-firmware-0.21rc3.tar.bz2
> > > >> > https://api.merproject.org/public/source/nemo:devel:hw:ti:o
> > > >> > map3:n950-n9/ti-wl1273-bt-firmware/bt-firmware-ti1273_0.23+0
> > > >> > m6.tar.gz
> > > >>
> > > >> Would be nice to have them added to the linux-firmware.git.
> > > >
> > > Now when driver is queued for staging, can somebody add firmware files
> > > to linux-firmware repository? Note that without firmware files, driver
> > > not working...
> >
> > I just had a look at the file for the Nokia N900
> > (bcm-bt-firmware-0.21rc3.tar.bz2) and I think the license is too
> > restrictive for linux-firmware.git. Actually I can't see any
> > statement allowing redistribution. For reference this is the license
> > text:
> >
> > Copyright (c) Nokia Corporation 2010
> > All Rights Reserved.
> >
> > This material, including documentation and any related computer programs, is
> > protected by copyright controlled by Nokia Corporation. All rights are
> > reserved. Modifying, adapting and/or translating, any or all of this material
> > requires the prior written consent of Nokia. Distribution for commercial
> > purposes not allowed without prior written approval from Nokia.
>
> With my lingvistics hat on, this says "distribution for non-commercial
> purposes is ok". (Because otherwise, they would say "Distribution not
> allowed without ...")
It implies that ('the exception proves the rule'), but that's not
something I would like to rely on.
Anyway, I think that anything added to linux-firmware.git ought to be
safe to include in a commercial distribution, so a non-commercial
restriction can't be accepted.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Absolutum obsoletum. (If it works, it's out of date.) - Stafford Beer
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (812 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists