linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 02/15] mfd: max14577: Rename and add MAX14577 symbols to prepare for max77836

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140219141102.GA2669@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Wed, 19 Feb 2014 23:11:02 +0900
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
Cc:	Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>,
	MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
	Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/15] mfd: max14577: Rename and add MAX14577 symbols
 to prepare for max77836

On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 01:44:41PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

> I want to push whole MAX77836 patchset through Lee Jones' MFD tree and I
> still need acks from power and regulator subsystems.

> I would appreciate if you could find time to look at these patches and
> let me know your opinion (or just add Acked-by):
> [PATCH v3 02/15] mfd: max14577: Rename and add MAX14577 symbols...
> [PATCH v3 03/15] mfd: max14577: Rename state container to maxim_core
> [PATCH v3 04/15] mfd: max14577: Add "muic" suffix to regmap and irq_chip

I don't have these patches, I expect it looked like the series was going
to get a respin.

To be honest the number of large patch serieses you've been sending
iterations of (sometimes partial series without context too) doesn't
push them up the priority list, it'd help to rate limit things a bit.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)