[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1643739.gIWxXCQHpB@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:52:53 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
Cc: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@...el.com>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
patches@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org,
Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] ACPI / processor_core: Rework _PDC related stuff to make it more arch-independent
On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 10:16:16 AM Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 2014年02月19日 08:50, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 12:23:55 AM Hanjun Guo wrote:
> >> _PDC related stuff in processor_core.c is little bit X86/IA64 dependent,
> >> rework the code to make it more arch-independent, no functional change
> >> in this patch.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
> >> Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>
> > I've queued up patches [1,3-5/5] from this series for 3.15 (modulo changelog
> > modifications), but this one should be CCed to the x86 and ia64 maintainers.
>
> Thanks! I will resend this patch with Tony and Thomas in cc list, so is
> there any chance for this
> patch to be merged into 3.15 if I get acked from them?
If they ack it, then yes, it can.
Thanks!
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists