[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140219190139.GQ10134@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 14:01:39 -0500
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: Derek Basehore <dbasehore@...omium.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...to.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, bleung@...omium.org, sonnyrao@...omium.org,
semenzato@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] backing_dev: Fix hung task on sync
Hello, Jan.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:27:31AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> You are the workqueue expert so you may know better ;) But the way I
> understand it is that queue_delayed_work() does nothing if the timer is
> already running. Since we queue flusher work to run either immediately or
> after dirty_writeback_interval we are safe to run queue_delayed_work()
> whenever we want it to run after dirty_writeback_interval and
> mod_delayed_work() whenever we want to run it immediately.
Ah, okay, so it's always mod on immediate and queue on delayed. Yeah,
that should work.
> But it's subtle and some interface where we could say queue delayed work
> after no later than X would be easier to grasp.
Yeah, I think it'd be better if we had something like
mod_delayed_work_if_later(). Hmm...
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists